Release 0.4.1 / 20 October 2026

Results, uncertainty and a testable protocol

Release 0.4.1 · 20 October 2026. Numerical results are visible beside their claims, with a clearer model choice and experimental interpretation.

What changed

Review findingImplementation or correction
Outputs were hard to inspectAdded full production-refinement and cross-implementation tables, acoustic profile intervals and scaling comparison weights beside each claim.
Upper memory boundary absent from MMSAdded a trajectory reaching m = 0.95 and a separate unmodified scalar saturation check, each with its precise scope.
Six equally promoted oscillator variantsDeclared M03-D for future oscillator comparison; five alternatives remain sensitivity controls. No synthetic-performance winner or physical superiority is claimed.
Wrong-sign elastomer framingReplaced the primary experimental null with E01-S softening under measured imposed strain, distinct from the stiffening toy oscillator.
Experiment cannot establish its own nullLead with the rejection interpretation; distinguish rejection, bounded equivalence, inconclusive results and a separate held-out predictive comparison.
Lineage citations incomplete in-pageFull Chua–Kang, Boyd–Chua and Rivera-Sierra–Bisquert citations now appear beside the derivation.
Parent-universe citation too indirectAdded Popławski 2016 as the direct child-universe precedent, retaining the distinct 2010 work as context. Neither is empirical evidence for Alpha 1.
Missing constraintsAdded 13 source records, including scaling, emergent gravity, cosmological rotation, travel, consciousness, regression and material softening.
Stale homepage ledger and inflated catalogue wordingUpdated the current release link, date, source count and research/speculation distinction.
AI rubric quoted as a scientific ratingRemoved the score. Published three evidence gates and current independent/publication status.
External identity actionsPrepared publication and review files; no DOI, repository, ORCID, OSF registration or reviewer identity has been fabricated.

Where the re-review was too strong

The pre-update package already contained the new homepage description, open–open boundary conditions, end-correction point estimates and a warning about elastomer softening. Those items needed better prominence or development, not invention. A model family can be scientifically legitimate if its members and selection rule are fixed; six variants are not intrinsically unfalsifiable. A matched-history residual rejects a specified null, but cannot by itself identify Keim-type memory or any unique mechanism.

What remains unresolved

No measured oscillator or elastomer validation, no new-physics prediction, no independent human replication and no external project identifier has been completed in this release. The external memristor data remain an attributed retrospective intake; this update does not manufacture a fit from incomplete device and calibration metadata.

Release files

Research archive 0.4.1 · CITATION.cff · CodeMeta · Download checksums · 124 source records

Previous research archives and the 0.4.0 checksum targets are retained byte-for-byte. Current source exports are versioned. Google Analytics G-1ESB3QPQ6B remains in the shared head with the existing privacy disclosure.