Pulse predictions from published parameters
A reproducible source audit, a measured comparison and explicit unresolved discrepancies.
Published parameters now have a reproducible calculation
Table S1 has been retrieved and implemented for four voltage-specific calibrations. The analytic pulse recurrence agrees with numerical integration of the same scalar ODE to 1.92 × 10⁻¹² in state. That is a numerical check, not independent validation or a new physical law.
Original article · Supporting information · Retrieved-file provenance
Compare against the deposited measurements
| Amplitude | Ideal pulse 11 end (µA) | Last sampled high point (µA) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 V | 11.349226 | 13.014281 | -12.79% |
| 3 V | 30.064915 | 26.757527 | +12.36% |
| 4 V | 47.777491 | 43.738939 | +9.23% |
| 5 V | 64.852446 | 62.564805 | +3.66% |
Conditional calculation: ideal 2 ms on / 2 ms off, internal voltage equal to applied voltage, no capacitive current, initial equilibrium. Last sampled points precede ideal endpoints. The full eleven-pulse trajectories disagree more at early times. This post-inspection comparison is descriptive; it supplies no uncertainty interval or replication pass.
All 1,330 rows and five traces remain available. Table S1 has no 1 V parameter set, so none is invented. Eleven pulses within a trace are correlated observations. Four voltages do not constitute four independent replications.
Figure 3 requires clarification
The caption gives τoff = 0.97 ms and τon = 0.98 s, while identifying the model as Figure 1’s. Figure 1’s rate function bounds τ at 1 ms. The panels also label time in ms while the caption lists pulse durations in seconds. These are unresolved specification differences; no silent unit correction is made.
Literal-caption and Figure-1 calculations · Full audit and limitations
Reproduce and review
Runnable source · Instructions · All calculated quantities · Per-pulse extracted observations · Complete research archive
Missing fitted objects, timing/observation assumptions and full-circuit reproduction remain open. Source-author clarification and independent review are separate. No outreach, submission or external review is recorded.